ScreenWiz

Two reviewers. Blind decisions. Clear conflicts.

ScreenWiz gives research teams a structured title/abstract and full-text workflow while keeping AI suggestions separate from human reviewer decisions.

Start screening
✓ Independent decisions✓ Conflict queues✓ Full-text reasons
Title / abstract screeningReviewer mode
IncludeInclude
IncludeExclude
MaybePending
IncludeInclude
Reviewer completion69%
Screen with confidence

Keep decision-making human and traceable.

Reviewers can work independently while project owners retain a structured path for conflict resolution and full-text eligibility decisions.

1│2

Independent reviewer columns

Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2 submit their own decisions without turning AI suggestions into reviewer votes.

!

Conflict resolution

Disagreements move into a dedicated resolution workflow rather than becoming an ordinary third vote.

PDF

Full-text review

Attach or upload source PDFs, separate not-retrieved reports from eligibility exclusions and record structured reasons.

Large projects

Stay oriented when the queue grows.

Pagination, filters, search and reviewer-focused views help teams work through large evidence sets without loading the entire project into one overwhelming screen.

⌕
Search and filtersFind records by bibliographic fields and combine with screening/full-text status.
#
Stable project orderPreserve the original project sequence across filters, sorting and pages.
AI
Optional AI suggestionsUse advisory suggestions without allowing them to overwrite human decisions.
Queue healthActive
0
0
0
0

Bring your review into one connected workspace.

Start with citation screening and keep evidence, reviewer decisions, datasets and analysis connected from beginning to end.

Request a demo