Structured data extraction

From PDF to analysis-ready data—with the source in view.

Extract quantitative evidence, verify it against the article, keep reviewer drafts independent and reconcile only after the evidence is checked.

✓ Reviewer drafts✓ Source verification✓ Statistical routing
Extracted evidenceSource verified
OutcomeValueSourceRoute
Mortality14 / 208Table 2Binary
Length of stay8.4 ± 2.1Table 3Continuous
Overall survivalHR 1.42Table 4HR
MyosteatosisOR 1.78Fig. 2Verify
Source-first rule: confirm group, outcome, unit, time point and reference category before moving evidence into a dataset.
Extraction safeguards

Numbers need context before they become evidence.

A correct number attached to the wrong outcome, time point or reference group is still wrong. MetaWiz keeps those semantic checks visible.

✓

Verify the source

Check the article location, row, column, group, unit and time point before accepting a candidate value.

⇄

Map compatible data

Route values only when the statistical structure and clinical outcome are compatible with the destination dataset.

2×

Reconcile reviewers

Keep reviewer drafts separate and create the canonical analysis record only after reconciliation.

Supported evidence patterns

Structured around what studies actually report.

μ
Continuous outcomesSample size, mean and SD structures for MD or SMD workflows.
%
Dichotomous outcomesEvents and totals for RR or OR analyses.
HR
Time-to-event effectsHazard ratios with confidence intervals and model context.
2×2
Diagnostic accuracyTP, FP, FN and TN structures for diagnostic evidence synthesis.
Reviewer → final datasetControlled
R1

Draft

Independent extraction

R2

Draft

Independent extraction

03

Compare

Resolve discrepancies

04

Final

Analysis-ready row

Bring your review into one connected workspace.

Start with citation screening and keep evidence, reviewer decisions, datasets and analysis connected from beginning to end.