Live evidence workspace

Evidence synthesis that feels alive.

Screen studies, verify full text, extract structured data and move into meta-analysis while your project dashboard keeps the whole review visible.

✓ Dual-reviewer workflow✓ Optional AI assistance✓ Audit-ready research records
Dashboard numbers are illustrative until the public metrics feed is enabled.
Live project dashboardDemo live
0+18 today
069%
014%
07.4%
Screening progressReviewer activity
Study #1248 imported from PubMed
Reviewer 2 screened 6 records
Conflict resolved — full text requested
One connected workflow

From citations to conclusions.

Keep every stage connected so your team can see what changed, what still needs review and what is ready for analysis.

01

Import

Bring citations together, preserve source information and deduplicate.

02

Screen

Independent reviewer decisions, conflict resolution and full-text review.

03

Extract

Verify values against source articles and reconcile reviewer entries.

04

Analyze

Build compatible datasets, assess bias and run evidence synthesis.

Built for evidence teams

Serious review methods. Cleaner research operations.

MetaWiz combines the workflow researchers expect with safeguards that keep human verification central.

2×

Independent review

Support blinded reviewer workflows, disagreements and eligible adjudication without collapsing decisions into one column.

Explore ScreenWiz →
↗

Source-first extraction

Keep extracted evidence tied to the article context before values move toward analysis-ready datasets.

See extraction →
∑

Integrated meta-analysis

Move reconciled data into compatible analyses while retaining the methodological context of the review.

See analysis →
Human-led by design

AI can assist. Researchers decide.

MetaWiz is designed around source verification, independent human review and transparent research decisions. AI-assisted functions are optional support tools rather than substitutes for scientific judgment.

✓
Verify against sourceReview the original article before accepting extracted values.
✓
Preserve reviewer independenceKeep independent decisions separate until the appropriate comparison stage.
✓
Keep an audit trailUse structured workflow actions rather than silent changes to final evidence.
Evidence integrityHuman verified
2independent reviewers
1reconciled final record
100%source verification expected
0AI votes counted as human review

Bring your review into one connected workspace.

Start with citation screening and keep evidence, reviewer decisions, datasets and analysis connected from beginning to end.